-47.0%
HTZ vs LH
+16.1%
-63.1%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.4% | +2.7% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.5% | +9.9% | +8.1% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +4.3% | +43.1% | +46.4% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +25.5% | -80.4% | -56.6% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +17.0% | -64.0% | -40.2% |
| All | -47.0% | +16.1% | -63.1% | -40.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling