-47.0%
HTZ vs KRMN
-56.7%
+9.7%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.3% | +2.7% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -12.3% | +19.7% | +9.6% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -27.5% | +74.9% | +55.8% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -26.5% | -28.4% | -52.9% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -59.6% | +12.6% | -43.5% |
| All | -47.0% | -56.7% | +9.7% | -43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling