-86.5%
HTZ vs IAG
+746.3%
-832.8%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IAG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -2.2% | +3.5% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.5% | +8.0% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +28.9% | +18.5% | +40.2% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +19.1% | -74.0% | -56.5% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -10.3% | -36.8% | -47.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +24.2% | -79.4% | -57.4% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +116.5% | -174.1% | -62.5% |
| All | -86.5% | +746.3% | -832.8% | -91.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IAG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IAG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IAG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IAG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling