-70.6%
HTZ vs HALO
+88.2%
-158.8%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HALO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -5.7% | -15.1% | -18.8% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -6.3% | -1.5% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -13.1% | +12.1% | -25.2% | -14.7% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +47.1% | -32.4% | +7.0% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +86.7% | -157.3% | -67.7% |
| All | -70.6% | +88.2% | -158.8% | -67.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HALO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HALO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HALO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HALO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling