-86.5%
HTZ vs GPC
-1.1%
-85.5%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GPC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.2% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.2% | +6.3% | +6.8% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +6.0% | +41.5% | +43.4% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +42.6% | -97.5% | -64.2% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +22.8% | -69.8% | -53.6% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +15.5% | -70.7% | -60.1% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +2.0% | -59.7% | -59.1% |
| All | -86.5% | -1.1% | -85.5% | -87.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GPC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GPC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GPC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GPC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling