-86.5%
HTZ vs FROG
+198.7%
-285.2%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -3.3% | +4.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -11.3% | +18.8% | +8.6% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +3.6% | +43.8% | +46.2% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +1.7% | -56.6% | -55.3% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +123.5% | -170.5% | -53.0% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +40.2% | -95.5% | -58.1% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +81.0% | -138.6% | -62.0% |
| All | -86.5% | +198.7% | -285.2% | -91.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling