-86.5%
HTZ vs FIVE
+50.0%
-136.6%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIVE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +5.1% | -3.8% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +4.3% | +3.2% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +12.5% | +34.9% | +41.2% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +31.2% | -86.1% | -59.4% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +14.4% | -61.4% | -50.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +33.9% | -89.1% | -60.5% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +65.1% | -122.7% | -65.9% |
| All | -86.5% | +50.0% | -136.6% | -90.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIVE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIVE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIVE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIVE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling