-47.0%
HTZ vs FCUV
-10.7%
-36.3%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FCUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -13.7% | +15.0% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +62.8% | -55.4% | +8.4% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +66.5% | -19.1% | +49.5% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +459.9% | -514.8% | -52.6% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -12.4% | -34.6% | -48.4% |
| All | -47.0% | -10.7% | -36.3% | -48.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling