-86.5%
HTZ vs ET
+98.0%
-184.6%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +0.3% | +1.0% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +0.9% | +6.6% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +7.5% | +40.0% | +42.9% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +11.4% | -66.3% | -57.0% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +18.5% | -65.5% | -51.1% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +37.4% | -92.6% | -61.5% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +30.9% | -88.6% | -62.8% |
| All | -86.5% | +98.0% | -184.6% | -92.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling