-86.5%
HTZ vs EFV
+91.7%
-178.2%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EFV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.1% | +1.5% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.5% | +6.0% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +1.7% | +45.7% | +43.6% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +8.6% | -63.5% | -61.0% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +11.7% | -58.7% | -56.0% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +19.3% | -74.5% | -67.2% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +30.2% | -87.9% | -73.9% |
| All | -86.5% | +91.7% | -178.2% | -96.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EFV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EFV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EFV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EFV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling