-80.2%
HTZ vs DAR
+13.0%
-93.1%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -3.1% | -17.7% | -19.6% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -8.1% | +0.3% | -4.4% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -17.1% | +4.0% | -6.7% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -12.3% | +27.0% | +18.6% |
| 6M | -70.6% | -21.8% | -48.8% | -68.2% |
| YTD | -65.2% | +40.8% | -106.0% | -72.6% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | +57.4% | -130.5% | -80.2% |
| All | -80.2% | +13.0% | -93.1% | -84.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling