-86.5%
HTZ vs DAR
+6.3%
-92.9%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.9% | +2.2% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.4% | +6.1% | +6.8% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +12.8% | +34.7% | +38.4% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +7.4% | -62.3% | -57.1% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +22.3% | -69.3% | -53.3% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +81.1% | -136.3% | -68.0% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +106.5% | -164.1% | -72.4% |
| All | -86.5% | +6.3% | -92.9% | -87.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling