-86.5%
HTZ vs CLBK
+51.7%
-138.2%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.2% | +6.3% | +6.6% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +9.1% | +38.3% | +39.3% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +27.7% | -82.6% | -62.0% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +40.8% | -87.8% | -58.3% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +66.4% | -121.6% | -68.8% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +72.4% | -130.0% | -71.7% |
| All | -86.5% | +51.7% | -138.2% | -89.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling