-47.0%
HTZ vs BTSG
+48.5%
-95.5%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.1% | +2.5% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +2.7% | +4.8% | +7.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -3.6% | +51.1% | +47.7% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +5.8% | -60.7% | -55.6% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +44.7% | -91.7% | -51.1% |
| All | -47.0% | +48.5% | -95.5% | -51.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling