-47.0%
HTZ vs BLDR
-32.8%
-14.2%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +2.5% | -1.2% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.8% | +10.3% | +7.2% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -13.3% | +60.7% | +44.6% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -12.3% | -42.6% | -55.9% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -31.5% | -15.5% | -41.0% |
| All | -47.0% | -32.8% | -14.2% | -41.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling