-57.6%
HTZ vs BLDR
-52.1%
-5.6%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +2.5% | -1.2% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.8% | +10.3% | +7.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -13.3% | +60.7% | +48.8% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -12.3% | -42.6% | -55.5% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -31.5% | -15.5% | -43.0% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -36.1% | -19.2% | -49.6% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -54.1% | -3.6% | -52.0% |
| All | -57.6% | -52.1% | -5.6% | -52.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling