-52.7%
HTZ vs BIYA
-99.9%
+47.2%
-82.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.4% | +0.9% | -9.3% | -8.4% |
| 7D | -14.6% | -10.5% | -4.1% | -14.3% |
| 30D | -20.8% | -51.7% | +31.0% | -19.2% |
| 3M | -18.8% | -60.8% | +42.0% | -17.1% |
| 6M | -74.7% | -90.6% | +15.9% | -74.7% |
| YTD | -68.1% | -97.1% | +29.0% | -67.2% |
| 1Y | -73.5% | -99.1% | +25.6% | -71.1% |
| All | -52.7% | -99.9% | +47.2% | -39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling