-80.2%
HTZ vs BIIB
-2.2%
-77.9%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -4.1% | -16.7% | -19.2% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -2.3% | -5.4% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -13.1% | +9.4% | -22.5% | -15.2% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +18.1% | -3.3% | +9.0% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +29.0% | -99.6% | -73.5% |
| YTD | -65.2% | +38.6% | -103.8% | -69.8% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | +59.0% | -132.2% | -78.2% |
| All | -80.2% | -2.2% | -77.9% | -78.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling