-66.4%
HTZ vs BIIB
+68.6%
-135.1%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +2.2% | +7.0% | +8.7% |
| 7D | +18.9% | +4.3% | +14.7% | +18.0% |
| 30D | +26.3% | +13.8% | +12.5% | +23.7% |
| 3M | +49.7% | +22.1% | +27.6% | +45.0% |
| 6M | -61.1% | +35.9% | -97.0% | -63.8% |
| YTD | -56.0% | +44.6% | -100.6% | -61.0% |
| 1Y | -66.4% | +70.4% | -136.8% | -74.0% |
| All | -66.4% | +68.6% | -135.1% | -74.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling