-86.5%
HTZ vs BHP
+76.8%
-163.3%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.3% | +1.7% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.9% | +10.4% | +9.5% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +3.4% | +44.1% | +44.6% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +4.1% | -59.0% | -56.1% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +20.6% | -67.6% | -53.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +56.1% | -111.3% | -67.0% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +69.6% | -127.2% | -70.9% |
| All | -86.5% | +76.8% | -163.3% | -91.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling