-80.2%
HTZ vs BG
+1.4%
-81.5%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | +1.6% | -22.4% | -21.3% |
| 7D | -7.7% | +2.6% | -10.4% | -8.6% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -8.2% | -4.9% | -10.9% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -7.0% | +21.7% | +16.1% |
| 6M | -70.6% | -23.5% | -47.1% | -68.0% |
| YTD | -65.2% | +12.6% | -77.8% | -68.9% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | +5.8% | -78.9% | -75.3% |
| All | -80.2% | +1.4% | -81.5% | -82.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling