-86.5%
HTZ vs BBIO
+149.5%
-236.0%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.8% | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.3% | +9.8% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -8.7% | +56.2% | +51.7% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +11.2% | -66.1% | -56.3% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +12.5% | -59.5% | -49.0% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -2.2% | -53.1% | -55.4% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +44.4% | -102.0% | -62.8% |
| All | -86.5% | +149.5% | -236.0% | -90.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling