-79.9%
HTZ vs BBIO
+191.8%
-271.6%
-85.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | +1.1% | +8.2% | +9.0% |
| 7D | -27.4% | +2.1% | -29.6% | -27.7% |
| 30D | -11.4% | +21.0% | -32.3% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -33.1% | -5.0% | -28.1% | -31.9% |
| 6M | -73.5% | +23.0% | -96.5% | -75.1% |
| YTD | -68.1% | +4.0% | -72.1% | -68.8% |
| 1Y | -74.3% | +19.5% | -93.8% | -75.9% |
| All | -79.9% | +191.8% | -271.6% | -87.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling