-86.4%
HTZ vs ARMK
+144.6%
-231.0%
-95.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.9% | +2.2% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.4% | +9.9% | +8.9% |
| 30D | +47.4% | 0.0% | +47.4% | +46.9% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +6.7% | -61.6% | -56.8% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +38.8% | -85.8% | -57.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +55.2% | -110.4% | -66.4% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +46.6% | -104.3% | -67.1% |
| 3Y | -86.6% | +112.9% | -199.5% | -92.1% |
| All | -86.4% | +144.6% | -231.0% | -92.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling