-86.5%
HTZ vs ALK
+2.1%
-88.6%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.5% | -0.2% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.7% | +8.1% | +7.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -19.2% | +66.7% | +60.0% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -1.5% | -53.4% | -55.9% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -13.1% | -34.0% | -46.0% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -16.4% | -38.8% | -53.7% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -33.1% | -24.6% | -52.1% |
| All | -86.5% | +2.1% | -88.6% | -87.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling