-74.9%
HTZ vs ALHC
+35.2%
-110.2%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +10.1% | -1.0% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -0.5% | +19.4% | +18.9% |
| 30D | +26.3% | -4.2% | +30.5% | +26.5% |
| 3M | +49.7% | -39.8% | +89.5% | +56.6% |
| 6M | -61.1% | -57.7% | -3.4% | -58.2% |
| YTD | -56.0% | -58.8% | +2.8% | -52.6% |
| 1Y | -66.4% | -52.4% | -14.0% | -64.2% |
| All | -74.9% | +35.2% | -110.2% | -74.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling