-86.5%
HTZ vs ACGL
+34.2%
-120.8%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.7% | +3.1% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.7% | +8.2% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -1.0% | +48.4% | +47.5% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +11.0% | -66.0% | -56.2% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -0.3% | -46.7% | -47.3% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +2.3% | -57.5% | -55.9% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +6.4% | -64.0% | -58.8% |
| All | -86.5% | +34.2% | -120.8% | -86.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling