-74.9%
HTZ vs ABCL
+164.7%
-239.6%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +0.8% | +8.4% | +9.0% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -10.0% | +28.9% | +21.1% |
| 30D | +26.3% | -10.9% | +37.1% | +28.2% |
| 3M | +49.7% | +101.6% | -52.0% | +25.2% |
| 6M | -61.1% | +167.5% | -228.6% | -71.0% |
| YTD | -56.0% | +259.1% | -315.1% | -70.4% |
| 1Y | -66.4% | +152.2% | -218.6% | -75.3% |
| All | -74.9% | +164.7% | -239.6% | -83.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling