+19.6%
HPQ vs ZETA
+348.6%
-329.0%
-51.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.7% | +3.3% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +18.1% | -14.9% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -3.6% | +13.6% | -17.2% | -5.5% |
| 3M | -5.3% | +23.7% | -29.0% | -8.5% |
| 6M | +41.1% | +128.5% | -87.4% | +25.0% |
| YTD | +36.9% | +80.1% | -43.2% | +23.8% |
| 1Y | +23.5% | +98.0% | -74.5% | +10.3% |
| 3Y | +19.6% | +348.6% | -329.0% | -5.7% |
| All | +19.6% | +348.6% | -329.0% | -5.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling