+77.7%
HPQ vs ZCMD
-99.4%
+177.1%
-24.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | +4.0% | +0.9% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -4.1% | +6.4% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +9.7% | -22.7% | +32.5% | +9.6% |
| 3M | +32.7% | -62.5% | +95.2% | +30.8% |
| 6M | +77.7% | -99.5% | +177.2% | +50.7% |
| All | +77.7% | -99.4% | +177.1% | +50.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling