+18.1%
HPQ vs NIO
-52.9%
+71.0%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -3.8% | +4.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +0.5% | +2.8% | -2.3% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -5.9% | -8.4% | +2.5% | -5.4% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -32.0% | +28.2% | -1.2% |
| 6M | +28.1% | -43.9% | +72.0% | +32.7% |
| YTD | +32.5% | -35.7% | +68.2% | +37.1% |
| 1Y | +18.1% | -51.1% | +69.2% | +31.1% |
| All | +18.1% | -52.9% | +71.0% | +31.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling