+35.9%
HPQ vs GLDM
-13.2%
+49.1%
-24.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.8% | -2.5% | -3.3% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +4.7% | -5.8% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -0.9% | -10.9% | -12.1% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -4.3% | +6.3% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +35.9% | -13.4% | +49.3% | +34.3% |
| All | +35.9% | -13.2% | +49.1% | +34.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling