+155.0%
HPE vs ZM
+13.6%
+141.3%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +12.4% | +0.1% | +12.3% | +12.4% |
| 7D | +19.4% | -5.7% | +25.1% | +20.8% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -9.1% | +14.7% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +33.1% | +3.5% | +29.5% | +30.9% |
| 6M | +192.5% | +25.7% | +166.8% | +179.8% |
| YTD | +160.9% | +10.8% | +150.2% | +156.3% |
| 1Y | +155.0% | +12.8% | +142.2% | +150.3% |
| All | +155.0% | +13.6% | +141.3% | +150.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling