+224.1%
HPE vs DXCM
-16.2%
+240.3%
-48.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DXCM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -2.0% | -2.5% | -4.2% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -3.2% | +2.6% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -2.3% | +6.3% | -8.6% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -2.9% | +21.1% | -24.0% | -5.8% |
| 6M | +143.6% | +20.6% | +123.0% | +136.2% |
| YTD | +118.5% | +32.4% | +86.1% | +108.5% |
| 1Y | +129.2% | +8.8% | +120.4% | +125.0% |
| All | +224.1% | -16.2% | +240.3% | +216.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DXCM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DXCM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DXCM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DXCM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling