+258.2%
HLT vs ZM
+46.9%
+211.3%
-50.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.7% | +0.5% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.6% | -2.7% | +0.2% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -2.6% | -10.0% | +7.4% | -2.0% |
| 3M | -9.4% | +1.6% | -11.0% | -9.7% |
| 6M | +2.7% | +25.0% | -22.2% | +0.5% |
| YTD | +6.8% | +10.6% | -3.9% | +5.2% |
| 1Y | +12.4% | +14.0% | -1.6% | +10.3% |
| 3Y | +100.2% | +32.5% | +67.7% | +93.5% |
| 5Y | +143.7% | -68.3% | +212.1% | +131.6% |
| All | +258.2% | +46.9% | +211.3% | +216.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling