+99.3%
HLT vs ZETA
+269.4%
-170.1%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.2% | +1.2% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -3.7% | +2.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -5.0% | +5.7% | -10.7% | -5.6% |
| 3M | -10.4% | +50.4% | -60.8% | -14.0% |
| 6M | +3.2% | +65.5% | -62.2% | -2.4% |
| YTD | +6.7% | +48.3% | -41.6% | +1.5% |
| 1Y | +10.3% | +45.4% | -35.1% | +4.5% |
| 3Y | +99.3% | +270.8% | -171.4% | +62.7% |
| All | +99.3% | +269.4% | -170.1% | +62.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling