+99.3%
HLT vs VICR
+209.3%
-109.9%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +11.2% | -11.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +5.0% | -6.6% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -5.0% | -12.5% | +7.5% | -4.4% |
| 3M | -10.4% | -33.6% | +23.2% | -8.8% |
| 6M | +3.2% | +10.7% | -7.4% | -0.5% |
| YTD | +6.7% | +80.6% | -73.8% | -1.5% |
| 1Y | +10.3% | +288.4% | -278.1% | -5.4% |
| 3Y | +99.3% | +213.8% | -114.5% | +79.2% |
| All | +99.3% | +209.3% | -109.9% | +79.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling