+419.5%
HL vs ZETA
+272.3%
+147.1%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -1.2% | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -0.1% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +18.8% | +10.5% | +8.4% | +17.2% |
| 3M | +43.7% | +44.3% | -0.6% | +37.1% |
| 6M | -1.0% | +59.4% | -60.5% | -7.0% |
| YTD | +8.7% | +49.5% | -40.8% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | +105.0% | +62.7% | +42.3% | +91.4% |
| All | +419.5% | +272.3% | +147.1% | +238.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling