+249.6%
HL vs ZETA
+348.6%
-98.9%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -1.7% | -0.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -11.1% | +18.1% | -29.2% | -13.1% |
| 30D | -12.1% | +13.6% | -25.7% | -13.6% |
| 3M | -26.1% | +23.7% | -49.8% | -28.3% |
| 6M | -37.7% | +128.5% | -166.2% | -43.9% |
| YTD | -31.7% | +80.1% | -111.8% | -37.1% |
| 1Y | -11.6% | +98.0% | -109.6% | -19.3% |
| 3Y | +249.6% | +348.6% | -98.9% | +104.1% |
| All | +249.6% | +348.6% | -98.9% | +104.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling