+228.7%
HL vs UMC
+143.5%
+85.1%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +2.4% | -3.5% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +9.0% | -13.4% | -7.1% |
| 30D | +9.3% | +17.2% | -7.9% | +3.1% |
| 3M | +32.0% | +11.4% | +20.6% | +23.1% |
| 6M | -6.4% | +137.5% | -143.9% | -36.0% |
| YTD | +3.1% | +193.1% | -190.0% | -36.3% |
| 1Y | +77.6% | +240.3% | -162.7% | +2.9% |
| 3Y | +392.8% | +262.2% | +130.6% | +168.0% |
| All | +228.7% | +143.5% | +85.1% | +73.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling