+416.5%
HL vs CMS
+35.9%
+380.7%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.2% | -2.3% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +1.5% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +25.1% | -3.6% | +28.7% | +26.9% |
| 3M | +22.9% | -1.9% | +24.8% | +22.6% |
| 6M | -4.9% | -11.0% | +6.1% | 0.0% |
| YTD | +7.8% | +0.2% | +7.6% | +6.1% |
| 1Y | +133.9% | -1.3% | +135.2% | +131.2% |
| All | +416.5% | +35.9% | +380.7% | +252.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling