-41.6%
HIMS vs ZETA
+61.0%
-102.6%
-76.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.2% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -0.1% | -2.7% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -12.2% | +10.5% | -22.6% | -15.9% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +44.3% | -48.0% | -17.4% |
| 6M | +25.9% | +59.4% | -33.5% | +1.2% |
| YTD | -14.1% | +49.5% | -63.6% | -30.2% |
| All | -41.6% | +61.0% | -102.6% | -54.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling