+320.2%
HIMS vs XPO
+151.2%
+169.0%
-78.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XPO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.0% | -0.6% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -1.4% | -1.3% | 0.0% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -10.1% | -10.4% | +0.3% | -7.1% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -15.7% | +14.5% | +3.3% |
| 6M | +16.9% | -6.3% | +23.3% | +18.5% |
| YTD | -15.5% | +34.2% | -49.7% | -23.4% |
| 1Y | -42.6% | +39.9% | -82.5% | -48.9% |
| All | +320.2% | +151.2% | +169.0% | +234.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XPO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XPO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XPO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XPO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling