+320.2%
HIMS vs TNA
+99.7%
+220.5%
-78.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -3.0% | +1.4% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.4% | -7.6% | +6.2% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -10.1% | -13.6% | +3.6% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +2.8% | -4.1% | -2.3% |
| 6M | +16.9% | +34.5% | -17.6% | -2.4% |
| YTD | -15.5% | +41.0% | -56.5% | -32.1% |
| 1Y | -42.6% | +52.0% | -94.6% | -56.1% |
| All | +320.2% | +99.7% | +220.5% | +171.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling