-42.4%
HIMS vs TNA
+70.0%
-112.4%
-76.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +0.7% | -1.1% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -0.1% | -3.8% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -12.4% | -4.9% | -7.5% | -9.1% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +0.4% | -1.4% | -1.0% |
| 6M | +68.4% | +32.5% | +35.9% | +37.1% |
| YTD | -14.7% | +53.7% | -68.4% | -38.1% |
| 1Y | -42.4% | +65.1% | -107.5% | -61.1% |
| All | -42.4% | +70.0% | -112.4% | -61.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling