+197.3%
HIMS vs NXT
+191.6%
+5.6%
-78.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.8% | +0.8% | +8.0% | +8.6% |
| 7D | -21.9% | -5.7% | -16.2% | -20.3% |
| 30D | -32.1% | +18.5% | -50.6% | -35.4% |
| 3M | -31.8% | -4.1% | -27.7% | -31.3% |
| 6M | -28.6% | -20.3% | -8.3% | -25.4% |
| YTD | -35.9% | +15.5% | -51.4% | -40.8% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | -5.0% | -42.7% | -49.1% |
| All | +197.3% | +191.6% | +5.6% | +120.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling