-46.9%
HIMS vs NTRA
+92.9%
-139.8%
-76.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +0.9% | -0.6% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -0.7% | +0.2% | -1.0% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -8.2% | +4.1% | -12.3% | -9.4% |
| 3M | -4.7% | +50.0% | -54.7% | -17.6% |
| 6M | +6.3% | +67.3% | -61.0% | -14.9% |
| YTD | -15.3% | +43.6% | -58.9% | -27.4% |
| 1Y | -46.9% | +89.2% | -136.1% | -61.4% |
| All | -46.9% | +92.9% | -139.8% | -61.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling