-44.1%
HIMS vs NIO
-51.1%
+7.0%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -11.8% | +0.6% | -12.4% | -12.1% |
| 7D | -9.1% | +6.9% | -16.0% | -12.2% |
| 30D | -25.8% | -4.7% | -21.1% | -23.7% |
| 3M | -27.4% | -28.1% | +0.7% | -14.3% |
| 6M | -18.9% | -41.7% | +22.9% | +3.9% |
| YTD | -29.4% | -33.1% | +3.8% | -18.2% |
| All | -44.1% | -51.1% | +7.0% | -13.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling