-47.6%
HIMS vs GLDM
-3.6%
-44.0%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.8% | -1.2% | +10.0% | +9.4% |
| 7D | -21.9% | -2.0% | -20.0% | -21.0% |
| 30D | -32.1% | -4.4% | -27.6% | -30.2% |
| 3M | -31.8% | -8.8% | -22.9% | -27.7% |
| 6M | -28.6% | -15.9% | -12.7% | -22.6% |
| YTD | -35.9% | -7.7% | -28.2% | -31.0% |
| 1Y | -47.6% | -3.6% | -44.1% | -48.8% |
| All | -47.6% | -3.6% | -44.0% | -48.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling