-31.8%
HIMS vs ECHO
+14.5%
-46.3%
-43.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.8% | -1.9% | +10.7% | +9.1% |
| 7D | -21.9% | +3.6% | -25.6% | -22.8% |
| 30D | -32.1% | +7.5% | -39.5% | -33.3% |
| 3M | -31.8% | +16.2% | -48.0% | -32.6% |
| All | -31.8% | +14.5% | -46.3% | -32.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling