+327.3%
HIMS vs CNC
-2.4%
+329.7%
-78.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.8% | -0.2% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -4.9% | +2.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -12.2% | -3.8% | -8.4% | -12.1% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -3.2% | -0.5% | -3.7% |
| 6M | +25.9% | +47.9% | -22.0% | +25.7% |
| YTD | -14.1% | +55.7% | -69.7% | -14.3% |
| 1Y | -41.6% | +106.2% | -147.9% | -42.0% |
| All | +327.3% | -2.4% | +329.7% | +307.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling