+309.9%
HIMS vs AMC
-67.9%
+377.8%
-78.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +4.3% | -4.7% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -3.9% | +2.3% | -6.2% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -12.4% | -0.7% | -11.7% | -12.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +35.2% | -36.3% | -8.0% |
| 6M | +68.4% | +124.6% | -56.1% | +42.3% |
| YTD | -14.7% | +69.9% | -84.5% | -24.8% |
| 1Y | -42.4% | -2.6% | -39.8% | -44.5% |
| All | +309.9% | -67.9% | +377.8% | +337.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling