+68.4%
HIMS vs ALHC
-27.0%
+95.5%
-34.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | 0.0% | -0.4% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -0.6% | -3.3% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -12.4% | -1.0% | -11.4% | -12.4% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -10.2% | +9.1% | +2.6% |
| 6M | +68.4% | -28.3% | +96.7% | +80.3% |
| All | +68.4% | -27.0% | +95.5% | +80.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling